Electronic and digital signatures – what is the difference?

Electronic and digital signatures – what is the difference?

In the UK, the use of electronic and digital signatures on documents has become increasingly popular as technology has advanced. However, many people are still unsure of the difference between the two. This article will outline the key differences between electronic signatures and digital signatures, as well as their advantages and disadvantages.

What is an electronic signature or an eSignature?

An electronic signature, also known as an e-signature or eSignature, is a symbol or process attached to or associated with a document in order to indicate the signer’s agreement to the contents of the document. Electronic signatures can take the form of a typed name, a scanned signature, or a graphical representation of a signature. Electronic signatures can be used for a variety of purposes, including contracts, forms, and consent forms.

What is a digital signature?

One of the main differences between electronic signatures and digital signatures is the level of security they provide. A digital signature is a more secure form of electronic signature than an electronic signature. It uses encryption and digital certificates to verify the authenticity of the document and the signer. Digital signatures are considered to be a higher form of security than electronic signatures because they use encryption and digital certificates to verify the authenticity of the document and the signer.

This means that the document is protected from tampering and the signer’s identity is verified, reducing the risk of fraud or other malicious activity. Digital signatures also provide a clear record of who signed the document and when making it easier to track changes and detect any potential issues.

Differences between electronic signatures and digital signatures

Another key difference between electronic signatures and digital signatures is the level of legal recognition they have. Electronic signatures are legally recognised in the UK under the Electronic Communications Act 2000, which states that electronic signatures can be used for the same purposes as traditional signatures, provided that the electronic signature is reliable, and the signer’s identity is verified. The use of digital signatures is regulated by the Electronic Identity Verification Regulation 2016 and the Electronic Identification Regulation 2017 in the UK, and these regulations set out the minimum standards for digital signatures and ensure that they are secure and reliable.

Digital signatures are considered to have a higher level of legal recognition as they provide a higher level of security and authentication.

It is important to note that not all electronic signatures are considered to be secure enough to be used for legal purposes. In order to ensure the security and reliability of electronic signatures, it is important to follow best practices for document security and signer authentication. This includes verifying the signer’s identity, using secure communications channels, and storing signed documents in a secure location.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of both?

In terms of advantages, electronic signatures are faster and more convenient to use than traditional signatures, as they can be completed electronically from anywhere with an internet connection. They also reduce the risk of paper-based errors and increase efficiency by allowing multiple parties to sign a document simultaneously. Digital signatures, on the other hand, provide a higher level of security and legal recognition, they provide a hight level of authentication as well as a clear record of who signed the document and when. Electronic signatures have a lower level of authentication and are more vulnerable to tampering.

A disadvantage of digital signatures is that they can be more complex and difficult to use, as they require a higher level of technical knowledge and access to digital certificates. There are also costs associated with obtaining and issuing digital signatures which need to be factored into a business’s operating costs.

How can we help you with your electronic and digital signatures?

Both electronic signatures and digital signatures have their advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between the two will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the individual or law firm. Electronic signatures are faster and more convenient to use but provide a lower level of security and legal recognition. Digital signatures, on the other hand, provide a higher level of security and legal recognition but are more complex and difficult to use. When deciding which type of signature to use, it is important to consider the level of security and legal recognition required, as well as the ease of use and convenience. Read more here about our electronic signature solution and contact us if you would like to discuss it further.

 

DWF Customer Story

DWF Customer Story

The Challenge

DWF LLP is a multinational law firm headquartered in Manchester with 30 offices across the world. The firm has been ranked the 10th overall most innovative legal business in Europe in the 2017 Financial Times Most Innovative Lawyers Report and scored highest of all firms in Europe for innovation in the business of law.

DWF’s initial challenge was to make cost savings of two products rolled into one to rationalise solutions.

Because of the acquisition of other firms, it became apparent that legacy technologies were causing increasing costs in infrastructure and, ultimately, slowing any deployment of print applications to the newly acquired users.

DWF’s print solutions managed the printing macros from applications to the printers (MFDs) and email thread printing. The printing software would ultimately replace the solutions from two separate products across a large infrastructure. The new solution would improve IT support and management by simplifying the user experience.

The implementation, roll out, training and scalability of the solution across the large and geographically spread organisation was a factor in choosing the right product.

The firm wanted evidence of the cost saving of using electronic stationery and email printing at a granular level with detailed reports.

User productivity is a major concern, especially with the increased expectation to use electronic stationery with signatures. A solution was needed that was also easy roll out across remote desktops and intuitive to use in a homeworking and flexibility office environment.

 

The Solution

A successful pilot was set up and run within a few weeks with 200 people in a newly acquired business in one location.

Kutana worked closely with the IT team of DWF and members of the newly acquired business to understand the detailed print processes and configure Kappris to suit the needs of the users.

The users quickly gained the benefit of Kappris as the software replaces the default print option in all applications. This means fewer clicks were needed to print documents and integration is seamless. The solution was used and tested with any required configuration before rolling across the firm, office by office location.

iManage integration makes it easier for the users to identify their documents from a ‘follow-me print queue’. This has resulted in fewer mis-prints of unwanted documents and enhanced savings in both time and money.

Kappris is ‘client’ software and integrates with all applications. It was easy to make it the default printer driver so that it became intuitive to use. 

 

“Printing is a utility job that if it doesn’t work correctly is a major headache to the firm.  We already had benefits of print management solutions but the legacy technology was onerous on our infrastructure capacity to easily extend the applications to new users.  By switching to Kappris we have been able to not only match what we had but achieve greater savings because the system is so user-friendly.”

“A quick win is that the system has default printing options based on templates which helps adapt the user behaviour to the requirements of the firm and this has instantly made savings in the business.

“The reporting is derived from user’s print choices in all applications and we can now see, for example, who and how many documents are being ‘printed’ to electronic stationery rather than paper.  This has helped us quantify the cost and time savings and demonstrate the benefits to our users.

“The iManage integration has reduced printing of duplicate documents by looking up the naming convention and making it easier for the users to identify their jobs.”

Richard Hodkinson

CTO, DWF LLP

Get in touch

If you’d like to chat to us about how our technology can make a difference to your firm, or would like to join our mailing list for our blogs or events, then please get in touch.